shape
shape
shape
shape
shape
shape
6 April 2021 / Michael J. Dougherty

Supreme Court Issues Welcome Opinion Regarding Definition of Autodialers Under TCPA

On April 1, 2021, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in the case Facebook, Inc. v. Noah Duguid, et al, which decided the issue whether equipment that can store and dial telephone numbers can be found to be automatic telephone dialing systems under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), even if the equipment does not use a random or sequential number generator.  

The court found that it could not and specifically held, in order to qualify as an automatic telephone dialing system, otherwise known as an autodialer, a device must have the capacity either to store a telephone number using a random or sequential generator or to produce a telephone number using a random or sequential number generator.

This decision overturned the finding of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which held that an autodialer does not need to use a random or sequential generator to store numbers, it only needs to have the capacity to store numbers to be called and to dial such number automatically. In overturning the Ninth Circuit, the Supreme Court stated that expanding the definition of an autodialer to encompass any equipment that merely stores and dials telephone numbers would take a chainsaw to the nuanced problems Congress intended to address under the TCPA rather than the scalpel that it was meant to utilize.

The Supreme Court’s decision is a welcome one for the industry and reinforces the correct interpretation of the autodialer definition under the TCPA.  If the Ninth Circuit’s decision were permitted to stand, all cell phones would fall under the definition of an autodialer. This would create TCPA liability on even the ordinary user of a cell phone which was clearly not the intent of Congress.

If Weltman can be of any assistance to you regarding this matter or other collections issues, please feel free to reach out to our Consumer Collections team. 

This blog is not a solicitation for business and it is not intended to constitute legal advice on specific matters, create an attorney-client relationship or be legally binding in any way.

Related News

Insights / 16 June 2021

Bankruptcy Basics: Chapters 11 & 12 Filings

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a chilling effect on bankruptcies, however many experts anticipate a flurry of new filings in the near future, especially as existing holds on collection activities are lifted. Now is the time for creditors and to gain a firm understanding of bankruptcy concepts, tasks and deadlines.
Read More
Insights / 8 June 2021

Will Your Municipality Need To Issue A Refund?

The economic impacts of COVID-19 are expected to be significant. Not only have businesses and workers been impacted, but also local governments that rely on the economy for revenue. The impact of the coronavirus pandemic on local governments will be driven, in at least part, by those segments of the economy where incom
Read More
Alerts / 4 June 2021

The Comprehensive Debt Collection Improvement Act and its Impact on Debt Collectors

On May 13, 2021, the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R. 2547 also known as the Comprehensive Debt Collection Improvement Act (CDCIA). If passed by the Senate, the CDCIA would amend several existing consumer finance statutes and impose new requirements and limitations on debt collectors.
Read More

Join Our Email List

Get the latest articles and news delivered to your email inbox!
Subscribe

Contact the Author

Michael J. Dougherty

Shareholder
Contact

Join Our Email List