14 August 2019 / Sara M. Costanzo

Thieves Among Us

United States businesses lose an average of seven percent of their annual revenues to employee theft each year, according to statistics from Statistic Brain Research Institute1. Estimates range from $20 to $50 billion, making it one of the most costly and widespread challenges faced in today's business world.
According to the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE)2, approximately 95% of white collar criminals have no prior record. In fact, the higher the monetary value of the financial crime, the less likely it is that the perpetrator even has a prior criminal record. Consider this: 75% of employees have stolen from their employer at least once, according to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce3.
A few of the most commonly recognized types of fraud or theft by employees are: 
  • Larceny: taking cash or property from the business, such as taking cash out of the cash register or stealing inventory from the loading dock
  • Embezzlement: theft of cash or property by someone in a position of trust, such as a bookkeeper or senior executive
  • Time theft: using company time to conduct personal business
  • Invoice schemes: setting up a false vendor account and paying the vendor for nonexistent goods or services
  • Payroll schemes: falsifying time cards for a greater amount of hours than actually worked
  • Expense reimbursement schemes: padding expense reports by adding items that were never incurred or were not business-related
Embezzlement is slightly different from other forms of employee theft because it involves an employee who was entrusted by the organization to safeguard the very property that was stolen. The United States Department of Justicedefines embezzlement as “the fraudulent appropriation of property by a person to whom such property has been entrusted, or into whose hands it has lawfully come.” 

To prove the crime of embezzlement, the prosecutor must establish:
  • There was a trust or fiduciary relationship between the defendant and the private organization or state/local government agency;
  • The property came into the possession or care of the defendant by virtue of his/her employment;
  • The defendant’s dealings with the property constituted a fraudulent conversion or appropriation of it to his/her own use; and
  • The defendant acted with the intent to deprive the owner the use of this property5.
Embezzlement can take many forms, and may vary depending on the position held by the employee in question. Employees may take checks meant for deposits, alter checks or payroll, misuse credit cards, take vendor kickbacks, or approve invoices otherwise unauthorized.  
The failure to proactively take steps to protect against employee fraud is like leaving the door to a vault unlocked and unguarded, with valuable assets exposed. Recognizing and understanding the red flags of employee embezzlement is the first step to avoiding losses. Some common behaviors to watch for are:
  • Never taking a vacation or sick time off from work
  • Requesting odd or unusual (off-peak) working hours 
  • Possessive of information at or around one’s work area
  • Lifestyle changes (expensive cars, jewelry, home, clothing)
  • Significant personal debt and credit problems
  • Lack of segregation of duties
  • Signs of an addiction problem
  • Irritability when questioned about work habits or work product
To proactively protect your organization against theft and fraud by employees, consider doing the following: 
  • Conduct a fraud risk assessment to understand the exposure. An accountant may be able to help with this.
  • Know the numbers. It’s essential to review financial statements regularly - quarterly at a minimum, but monthly is best. Watch for any unusual or unexpected changes and ask questions.
  • Segregate duties. No employee (or paid advisor) should have end-to-end control over a company’s finances.
  • Conduct an anti-fraud training for staff at least once a year. This will make employees aware of fraud schemes.
  • Cultivate a culture of integrity. Adopt a code of conduct and make sure that employees know that they are expected to behave ethically at all times.


4 Moore v. United States, 160 U.S. 268, 269 (1895)
5 United States v. Powell, 294 F. Supp. 1353, 1355 (E.D.Va. 1968), aff'd, 413 F.2d 1037 (4th Cir. 1968); United States v. Dupee, 569 F.2d 1061 (9th Cir. 1978)

Related News

Insights / 7 December 2021

Collateral Recovery Process: Recover While Staying Compliant

Weltmans collateral recovery team recently attended the Cherokee Media Groups Used Car Week to present The 3 Rs: Recovery, Replevins, & Reputation. This discussion was presented by shareholder Amy Clum Holbrook and attorney Stefanie Collier and moderated by national director of collections Dave Tommer.
Read More
Insights / 22 November 2021

A Step-By-Step Guide of the CFPB's New Rule: Regulation F Simplified

Many have been preparing for the effective date of Regulation F, which is November 30th. This new Rule will undoubtedly change the world of debt collection. With careful preparation and resources from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), navigating this new landscape is manageable.
Read More
Insights / 18 November 2021

How Physical Well-Being Improves Mental: Health From a Phenomenological Perspective

Mental health. It's a phrase that is often casually used, with various meanings attached to it, and sometimes stigmatized. Some look at it with a broad spectrum, while others think of it as taboo. Some take mental health to be the textbook cases or finite terminology, and others view it as overall well-being.
Read More

Join Our Email List

Get the latest articles and news delivered to your email inbox!

Contact The Author

Sara M. Costanzo


Join Our Email List

Keep up-to-date with this topic and others by subscribing to our email list.