9 June 2022 / Matthew W. Pomy

Comparing Powers of Attorney and Guardianships: A Step-By-Step Guide

During the most recent Ohio Health Care Association Convention and Expo, attorney Matt Pomy presented on the topic of powers of attorney and guardianships. He focused on comparing these legal relationships and how best to approach each based on their relative strengths and weaknesses. This presentation was meant to be conversational and focused on common questions received from credit unions and healthcare providers throughout Ohio and Pennsylvania.
The turnout was spectacular (even on the morning of the last day of the convention) and Matt had many engaging questions to help fuel the discussion. Because of this response, we are now providing a follow-up to this presentation, a review of the discussion, and a few of the common themes that encompass the demands surrounding this area of law.

The Basics

To understand powers of attorney and guardianships, it’s best to start at their most basic definitions. Powers of attorney, at their core, are documents which establish a fiduciary relationship between a person (principal) giving the authority to act on their behalf to another (agent). Guardianships are similar, but involve court proceedings to take away decision-making powers from one person (ward) and giving that authority to another (guardian). The agent and the guardian will be required to act in the best interest of the principal and the ward, respectively.
Powers of attorney do not typically need to be filed with a court to be enforceable. In some situations, such as real estate closings, the document may need to be filed with the local recorder of deeds. Guardianships, on the other hand, are extremely formal and are required to be initiated through the court system as either their own legal action or as part of another legal action if, for example, a guardian ad litem is needed during litigation.


It is clear from the discussion during this conference that most of the issues facing residential healthcare facilities deal with powers of attorney and some issues that stem from their relative informality. Many attendees were focused on three main questions: 
  1. How should I go about verifying a power of attorney if I’m presented one by an agent attempting to take a particular action?
  2. What documents should I require if a principal is attempting to revoke a power of attorney?
  3. What actions should I take if I’m receiving conflicting directions from the principal and agent?
These questions are difficult to answer because so much of the analysis on a power of attorney comes down to the document itself. In general, when presented with a power of attorney, it’s important to identify several things in the document when addressing a question (or just for future reference in case issues present themselves in the future). You’ll want to identify who the agent is, if any successor agent is named, when the document was signed, what specific powers are granted to the agent, any conditional grants of authority, anything specifically prohibited by the document, and whether the power of attorney has durable language to allow it to survive the incapacitation of the principal. 
If the agent is presenting this power of attorney to you attempting to take some action, best practices would dictate that you request some sort of photo identification from that agent to keep a copy in the principal’s file for future reference. Before allowing any action to go forward, you’ll want to make sure the language contained in the power of attorney allows the agent to take that action on behalf of the principal. Powers of attorney can be so varied in their grants of authority, so this will come down to the specific language of the document. Some will simply be a general grant of all authority, while others may allow the agent to, for example, sell stocks but not sell real estate, or the agent may be authorized to make gifts, but not gifts to the agent himself. 
So long as you and your institution has documented that the power of attorney complies with your local formality requirements, it grants the agent the authority to take the desired action. If the agent is who they say they are, you would be justified in moving forward with that agent. 
This issue is complicated when you know that a power of attorney can be terminated or revoked in many different ways. If the principal is competent, they can revoke the power of attorney in writing. The power of attorney will automatically be terminated if the principal dies or becomes incapacitated (if it is not durable). The power of attorney can even provide for its own termination in its language. The power of attorney will also be terminated if the agent passes away, resigns, or becomes incapacitated and there is no successor named. In particular, a writing from the principal revoking the power of attorney and the death of an agent could both happen without your institution being aware. Or, more problematically, a person with nefarious intent may claim one of those things happened in an attempt to take advantage of the institution’s lack of knowledge. This possibility clearly causes a lot of worry across institutions and is something many attendees were concerned about.


Ultimately, documentation is your best friend. As was discussed at some length during the presentation, it is not necessarily the institution’s prerogative to insert themselves in a controversy between principal and agent. However, it may become necessary at some point to require additional documentation before moving forward to support how your institution chose to act at the time. Or, more likely in this example, to justify who your institution listened to at the time.
While there are not typically formal legal requirements for a revocation of a power of attorney, it is likely best to at least require the revocation be in writing and signed by, if not presented to the institution by, the principal before recognizing the revocation. Additionally, since the principal would need to be competent at the time of the revocation, requiring this signature to be notarized and set up more like a formal affidavit would provide an additional layer of protection should questions arise in the future.
Typically, it is advised that clients tailor the writing specifically to each situation, as opposed to using standard forms. This allows the institution to have the principal sign a document that identifies the actions they are taking with particularity to remove any possible questions later.
To finish, and likely the most complicated situation, is what to do when the directions of the principal and the agent are in conflict. Similar with the revocation, documentation on the institution’s side will be extremely important. In these situations, tempers within the family can often run very hot, which often increases the chance of legal action down the road.
Signing a power of attorney does not remove the principal’s ability to act on their own behalf. This is one of the primary distinctions between powers of attorney and guardianships. A ward who has a guardian managing their finances cannot act on their own behalf, but a principal who has signed a power of attorney granting general authority to an agent can still take action independent of that agent. 
Because there is also a fiduciary duty from the agent to the principal, the agent is also required to follow all reasonable directions from their principal. This doesn’t mean following the principal’s direction at every turn without question. It is best to document with specificity what action the principal is attempting to take, how it conflicts with what the agent is directing, and what the principal wants to do in light of that apparent conflict. Put all of this in writing (ideally in a notarized affidavit-style document) and have the principal sign for your records. This will help you protect your institution by documenting exactly what was happening at the time and will justify how your institution moved forward. This will, ideally, keep the dispute solely between the principal/surrounding individuals and reduce the overall potential exposure of the institution.
When in these situations, limiting exposure to the institution is usually the primary goal of the documentation, so when in doubt, document everything. As discussed, many of the questions surrounding a power of attorney will be determined by the document itself, but when there is a grey area, it’s always best to over-document your activity. This is made all the easier if you’ve already taken the preliminary steps to verify the power of attorney before a controversy arises.
If you have additional questions, please contact attorney Matt Pomy and/or other members of Weltman’s consumer collections team to guide you through the process.
This blog is not a solicitation for business and it is not intended to constitute legal advice on specific matters, create an attorney-client relationship or be legally binding in any way.

Related News

Insights / 14 November 2022

Employer-Provided Incentives From Terminated Employees: Building a Proper Reimbursement Policy Is Key

In today's tight labor market, employers are offering more perks to recruit top candidates. Traditional incentives like higher salary, vacation, and hybrid work opportunities are prevalent.
Read More
News / 9 November 2022

Shareholder Amy Clum Holbrook Named to 2022 Women in Auto Finance List

Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., LPA, a full-service creditors' rights law firm with over 90 years of client service, is pleased to announce that shareholder Amy Clum Holbrook has been named to the 2022 Cherokee Media Group Women in Finance list!
Read More
Insights / 17 October 2022

Illinois POAs and Guardianships: Answering Your Top 3 Questions

When it comes to powers of attorney (POAs) and guardianships in Illinois, you may be asking yourself, Who is really in charge? or How can I avoid common pitfalls?
Read More

Join Our Email List

Get the latest articles and news delivered to your email inbox!

Contact the Author

Matthew W. Pomy


Join Our Email List