shape
shape
shape
shape
shape
shape
25 July 2018 / Scott S. Weltman

Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., LPA Prevails in Lawsuit Brought by Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

Topics: CFPB

Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., LPA (Weltman) is pleased to announce that the firm has prevailed in the lawsuit brought against it by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). Judge Donald C. Nugent, presiding over the case in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, issued an Opinion - finding on Weltman’s behalf - and confirming that the CFPB’s lawsuit lacked merit. The Court emphasized its finding “that lawyers were meaningfully involved disproves the Plaintiff’s sole theory of liability, and precludes recovery under the Complaint.”

“The Judge’s Opinion thoroughly vindicates Weltman’s processes and is a complete rejection of the CFPB’s unfounded allegations,” said Weltman Managing Partner Scott S. Weltman. “The Judge stressed that the CFPB ‘offered no evidence to show that any consumer was harmed by Weltman’s practice of identifying itself as a law firm in its demand letters,’ that ‘Weltman’s demand letters were truthful on their face,’ and that ‘Weltman attorneys were meaningfully and substantially involved in the debt collection process both before and after the issuance of the demand letters.’”

Continued Mr. Weltman, “Today’s Court Opinion is an affirmation of the confidence our law firm has maintained throughout the past three-and-a-half years in our operations and our employees. We would like to thank our valued clients for their unwavering support, and we look forward to continuing to provide the same quality representation that has been a hallmark of our creditors’ rights firm for the past 88 years.”

The CFPB sued Weltman in April 2017 after the firm refused to be strong-armed into a Consent Order. This followed a Civil Investigative Demand (CID) process initiated by the CFPB in September 2014. Weltman engaged Jones Day to defend the lawsuit, which included a four-day trial in May 2018, and maintained that, as a law firm, it is legally allowed, under federal and state law, to provide collection and legal services, and that the Firm is being truthful with consumers and factually accurate when it uses its name and company letterhead for proper debt collection activity. 

“We are grateful to Jim Wooley, Tracy Stratford, Ryan Doringo and the rest of our legal team at Jones Day for their hard work and tireless advocacy for our position. We are equally thankful for the outpouring of support from our colleagues in the collection and legal communities,” said Mr. Weltman. 

Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., LPA has not been the subject of any other formal government actions or disciplinary reviews. The CFPB has had other recent losses at the federal trial court level, including Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Borders & Borders, PLC in July 2017, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Universal Debt Solutions, LLC, et al. in August 2017, and the January 2018 rejection of the CFPB’s requests for both restitution and an injunction in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. CashCall. Additionally, as recently as June 2018, a federal judge deemed the CFPB’s structure unconstitutional, disqualifying it as a plaintiff in litigation against a New Jersey law firm (Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. RD Legal Funding, LLC et al).

 

Related News

Alerts / 12 November 2026

The Ohio Supreme Court's Recent Impact on Foreclosure Proceedings: Rethinking Whether to Proceed to Sheriff's Sale During a Pending Appeal

Historically, it has been common practice for foreclosure plaintiffs in Ohio to proceed with a sheriff's sale when a borrower appeals a judgment of foreclosure but fails to obtain a stay of execution pending appeal.
Read More
Insights / 3 November 2026

Ohio's New UCC Rules: What Secured Lenders Need To Know

Since October 6, 2026, a filed UCC-1 may no longer keep a lender first in line for certain types of collateral in Ohio. On July 7, 2026, Governor DeWine signed House Bill 195, which adopts the 2022 amendments to the Uniform Commercial Code.
Read More
Insights / 2 November 2026

From Court Order to Car Lot: On the Road to Recovering Collateral

A successful replevin action is an important step toward recovering collateral, but the work does not necessarily end once a vehicle is seized. For secured creditors, what happens immediately after recovery can have significant financial implications.
Read More

Join Our Email List

Subscribe

Contact The Author

Scott S. Weltman

Shareholder
Contact

Join Our Email List