shape
shape
shape
shape
shape
shape
28 September 2011

Storage and Repair Costs When Attempting to Gain Possession of Collateral

Does a creditor have to pay storage or repair costs to obtain a piece of property in Ohio? The answer is governed by what type of property at issue and under what type of interest the creditor is seeking recovery.

In general, an artisan’s lien is created by O.R.C 1333.41 covering all repair and materials provided to an item of personal property at the request of the owner.  This lien is valid so long as the artisan remains in possession of the personal property.  However, the lien is subject to any prior recorded security interest.  The artisan is required to follow very specific steps in order to enforce this lien by selling the property and may not attempt to enforce the lien until a year has passed without the owner attempting to recover the property or filing litigation over the property.   

This section specifically excludes motor vehicles.  If the property the creditor is seeking to repossess is not a motor vehicle and therefore governed by this section, the creditor will need to determine whether a valid artisan’s lien was created, whether the artisan is still in possession of the property and whether the creditor maintains a perfected security interest in that property.  If the perfected security interest pre-dates the artisan lien, the perfected security interest will win, and the creditor will not be required to pay the storage or repair costs. 

A creditor’s interest in the property created by way of a levy on the property makes the creditor a “lien creditor” as defined by O.R.C. 1309.317.  O.R.C. 1331.41 is silent as to the priority of a lien creditor’s lien versus an artisan’s lien.   The statute does seem to create the artisan’s lien at the time of non-payment, therefore before the levy which finds the property in the artisan’s hands.  Likely, the creditor attempting to recover the property through a levy will have to pay the repair and storage fees. 

If the property is a motor vehicle, other rules apply.  In contrast to the artisan’s lien on general property, a creditor with a lien on the title of a vehicle will not have to pay repair and storage charges to recover the vehicle.¹   However, if the vehicle is leased, the creditor will have to pay the repair and storage charges under ORC §1310.34.    

In general, when the state and local government is storing a vehicle, the creditor is going to have to pay the storage costs incurred in connection with that vehicle, regardless of its lien noted on the title.  For example, where the motor vehicle was seized during an arrest, O.R.C. §4511.195 requires payment of all expenses incurred with the vehicle’s removal and storage.  Likewise, if the car was impounded under O.R.C. §4513.61, the creditor will have to pay to gain possession of the property. 

Other types of property such as airplanes and boats are going to be subject to additional and varying statutes.  The answer, therefore, is that there is no one set answer to whether a creditor will have to pay storage and repair costs when trying to gain possession of a piece of property.  Each type of property will have to be viewed individually in reference to the applicable statute to determine whether a lien was created against the property that may trump the interest the creditor has in the property. 

If you have any questions on this matter, please contact Ms. Amanda R. Yurechko, Esq. Amanda is an associate in Consumer & Commercial Collections, focused on the Governmental Collections, Healthcare, Commercial Collections and Commercial Business Groups at Weltman.

-

¹See Commonwealth Loan Co. v. Berry, 2 Ohio St.2d 169, 207 N.E.2d 545; Snyder v. Ryan (1965) 2 Ohio St.2d 171, 207 N.E.2d 547.

Related News

Insights / 12 April 2024

Roulette Wheel of Compliance: Pitfalls and Strategies

Shareholder Don Mausar recently spoke at the International Association of Commercial Collectors (IACC) 2024 Annual Convention. During his presentation, Roulette Wheel of Compliance, Don discussed current compliance topics, including potential pitfalls and recommended strategies.
Read More
Insights / 11 April 2024

Utilities Credit & Collections Symposium: Our Top Three Takeaways

Shareholders Sara Costanzo and Amanda Yurechko recently attended the Conferences By Monticello 2024 Annual Utilities Credit & Collections Symposium in Miami-Coral Gables, FL.
Read More
Insights / 8 April 2024

How Will AI Effect the Subrogation Industry?

Attorney Cameron Deane recently attended the National Association of Subrogation Professionals (NASP) 2024 Spring Conference, held at the luxurious Hotel Hershey in Hershey, Pennsylvania. He is now sharing his takeaways!
Read More